audi r10
-
void
- (h)old
- Messaggi: 5661
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 17:11
- Contatta:
audi r10
Audi?s stunning V12 bi-turbo diesel engine is truly the star of its new Le Mans effort.
Audi launched the direct-injection ?TDI?-type engine in 1989. Today half of all new Audis carry a TDI powerplant, with the top of the line production diesel engine a 4.2-liter V8 offering 326 hp and 650 Nm torque.
The all-aluminum V12 bi-turbo is a huge leap forward. Although limited by the Le Mans regulations to a maximum displacement of 5.5 liters, a maximum boost of 2.94 bar, and a restricted air intake, the engine still develops 650 hp, and a stump-pulling torque of 1,100 Nm.
The experience for drivers and spectators used to screaming small displacement V8s will be unique - the diesel power band lies between 3,000 and 5,000 rpm. Equipped with diesel-particulate exhaust filters, the engine is said to be so quiet that the drivers can?t hear it when the car?s up to speed, while spectators and photographers will miss not only the howl of the engine, but also the off-throttle exhaust flames that have become a feature of night-time endurance racing.
Audi has a track record of migrating racing technologies to production cars. It?s not much of a stretch to predict that we will see aluminum-block high performance diesels in future production cars.
Full press release after the jump.
Audi Press Release: V12 TDI
The heart of the Audi R10 is a completely new V12 TDI engine with a cubic capacity of 5.5 litres ? the maximum permitted at Le Mans. Audi ventures into previously unexplored diesel-engine terrain with power exceeding 650 hp and torque of more than 1100 Newton metres from the V12 power plant. ?This engine is the specifically most powerful diesel there is in the world and, up until now, the biggest challenge that Audi Sport has ever faced in its long history,? explains Ulrich Baretzky, Head of Engine Technology at Audi Sport. ?There has never been anything remotely comparable. We started development with a clean sheet of paper.?
The V12 TDI used in the R10 is the first Audi diesel engine with an aluminium crank case. The cylinder-bank angle is 90 degrees. The V12 TDI has, like Audi production car engines, four valves per cylinder and twin overhead camshafts. The fuel induction is made by a modern ?Common Rail System?. The injection pressure easily exceeds the 1600 bar achieved in production cars. The ignition pressures also reach values never previously seen in any Audi engine.
The turbo pressure produced by the two Garrett turbochargers is limited by the regulations to 2.94 bars absolute, the diameter of both engine air intake restrictors, stipulated by the regulations, is 2 x 39.9 millimetres. The engine management is controlled by the latest generation of Bosch Motronic (MS14).
The engine?s power and the high torque are available to the driver practically from idling speed ? a speciality of diesel technology, to which the Audi drivers must now become accustomed. The usable power band lies between 3000 and 5000 revs per minute.
Unfamiliar to the driver at this early stage, is the low noise level and, unique for a racing engine, the smooth running V12 TDI power unit. At high speeds the powerful 650 hp engine can not be heard from the Audi R10 prototype?s ?open? cockpit while there is also hardly any vibration. On the outside, the modern twelve-cylinder produces a faint, but sonorous sound that quite possibly nobody would identify as a diesel power unit at first. The new R10 can only be recognised acoustically as a diesel-powered sportscar during the warming-up process or in the pit lane.
There are no visual signs that a diesel power unit is at work in the back of the R10. It goes without saying that the V12 TDI is equipped with a pair of diesel particle filters for the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Flashes of flame from the exhaust, which are created by unburned petrol in spark-ignition engines, are not seen coming from the R10.
One of the diesel engine?s biggest advantages is the low fuel consumption, especially at part-throttle and overrun. However, when compared to more classic circuits which demand a higher ratio of part throttle, the lower specific consumption will hardly be noticeable at Le Mans because the quota of full-throttle is almost 75 percent.
The enormous torque of over 1,100 Newton metres not only posed previously unforeseen demands in the development of the R10 drive train. Even the latest generation of engine dynamometers at Audi Sport had to be reequipped with special gearboxes capable of withstanding the unusual forces.
Inside the V12 TDI, the extremely high pressures in particular create forces never seen before in a racing engine. However, the main target of the Audi technicians is to reach the reliability level of the R8, which never recorded a single engine failure in the 77 races it has contested to date.
-
kart1980
- Messaggi: 119
- Iscritto il: sabato 5 febbraio 2005, 23:53
- Località: Modena/Ancona
-
void
- (h)old
- Messaggi: 5661
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 17:11
- Contatta:
At first glance, the R10 looks very similar to its R8 predecessor. However,
the innovations in the new car go far beyond its V12 turbo-diesel powerplant.
There are significant changes and innovations throughout the car, including
* chassis and bodywork
* dimensions
* aerodynamics
* electronics
* cockpit
* transmission
* cooling
* chassis dynamics
* brakes
Chassis and bodywork: The R8 had a traditional chassis with separate bodywork design. This has been replaced in the R10 with a Formula 1-like integration of the carbon fiber monocoque with the body - eliminating the need for separate bodywork to smooth the aerodynamics of the car. The result is a significant weight saving, which partly makes up for the weight of the 5.5-liter diesel compared to the 3.8-liter V8 it replaces.
The modular design of the R8 chassis, which allowed lightning-fast repair of the rear end of the R8, has been extended on the R10 to include the front of the car and access to the front suspension.
Dimensions: The V12 is considerably longer than the V8 it replaces, which necessitates a longer wheelbase for the R10.
Aerodynamics: The new Le Mans regulations for LMP1 cars were intended to slow the speed of the cars, in part by reducing downforce by about 15 percent, through restrictions on front splitter design, ride height, wings, etc. Audi says they have been able to recover ?the majority? of the new car?s aero efficiency through an extensive wind tunnel program. Despite the demands of the larger engine and cooling system, the new car?s profile is 5 cm lower than the R8?s.
Looking at the car, a number of aero features are evident. The high, ?stepped? front splitter is a response to the regulations. Moving rearward, it?s evident that the car is much more dramatically ?waisted? than the R8, with a narrower, more pointed nose and an even more pronounced gap between the sidepods and the nose and cockpit areas. The car now has even more of a ?formula car with pontoons? appearance.
The 2-seat cockpit required by the requlations now has to accomodate the HANS driver safety system, as well as separate rollover structures for the driver and the hypothetical passenger - the latter intended by the rulesmakers to reduce aero efficiency and slow the cars. In an interesting interpretation of the rules, Audi has adopted an innovative ?rollover pylon? design to replace the traditional roll-hoop - undoubtedly with aero benefits.
Following current F1 practice, the rear bodywork is now the minimum required to wrap around the engine and transmission, and seems, visually at least, to be dramatically lower than the R8. Certainly, from the cockpit rearward a tremendous amount has been done to get the regulation rear wing in clean air, to derive the maximum possible efficiency. The rear view shows the clever use of the wing endplates, which kick in to merge with the rear bodywork behind the wheels, thus creating with the tail of the sidepods what is in effect a downforce-creating plane parallel to the wing.
Electronics: The R10 makes greater use of onboard computers to control its major systems than did the R8, with all important functions computer-controlled over a CAN-bus network. This simplifies cockpit design, with fewer function-specific switches (for headlights, as an example).
Cockpit: The need to keep the cockpit area as narrow as possible for aerodynamics, while still allowing the driver to work at peak efficiency for long periods, puts considerable emphasis on cockpit design. With a relatively high pedal box, similar to an F1 car, plus the low profile of the bodywork, there is little room for the steering wheel. Audi?s minimalist interpretation of a drag-racer?s ?butterfly? wheel is the result. The wheel integrates a multifunction display and control system, and the shift paddles for the electro-pneumatic gear shift. Electric power steering replaces the R8?s hydraulic system.
Note the large row of shift lights placed as high on the wheel as possible. The diesel engine is said to be so quiet that the driver is unable to hear it at speed. Coupled with the engine?s much lower powerband than a gasoline V8, the driver will rely much more on the shift lights to tell him when to shift.
Transmission: The X-trac gearbox manages to accomodate the tremendous torque of the diesel while still being lighter than its R8 counterpart. No word on the number of gears - perhaps the wide powerband and low-end torque of the diesel allowed X-trac to save a gear? That would help account for the weight saving. A special ceramic clutch was developed to accomodate the engine, along with stronger rear axles.
Cooling: The V12 diesel requires greater cooling than the V8, resulting in larger radiators mounted inside higher sidepods, for a weight and aero penalty.
Chassis dynamics: The long wheelbase, coupled with the huge thrust of the diesel engine, would tend to make the understeering tendencies of a sports prototype almost unmanageable. Audi is dealing with this problem with specially-commissioned wide tread front tires, giving more front-end grip, although with an aerodynamic penalty through wider sidepods. Braking performance should benefit as well.
The huge torque of the engine would make it very difficult for the driver to modulate the throttle in low grip situations (rain, debris on the track), a problem which Audi manages with a traction control system.
Brakes: As in a modern F1 car, the carbon fiber brake disks are completely enclosed in an aerodynamic shroud, fed with cooling air by carbon-fiber ducting mounted on the suspension. (No more dramatic night-time views of glowing brake disks?)
As you can see, the design of a state-of-the-art sports car is a challenging system engineering problem, balancing conflicting requirements to come up with an integrated ?system of systems.? In the recent past, nobody has been better at this than Audi. It should be interesting to see the R10 perform! Sebring is 3 months away?
-
Mistostretto
- Messaggi: 3001
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 21:37
- Località: -------------------------------- 15674 River Forest Drive, Lake Oswego (Oregon) USA
- Contatta:
il PM10 ringrazia.
poi cosa? la formula uno a metano e poi a solar cell? poi a piedi, con i piloti che fanno brum brum con la bocca?
Voglio tornare negli anni 70/80 dove il diesel era il rumore della miseria, e i carburatori fiat/alfa in aspirazione prendevano dentro anche le vecchiette che passavano di lì e in F1 si vinceva e si crepava.
poi cosa? la formula uno a metano e poi a solar cell? poi a piedi, con i piloti che fanno brum brum con la bocca?
Voglio tornare negli anni 70/80 dove il diesel era il rumore della miseria, e i carburatori fiat/alfa in aspirazione prendevano dentro anche le vecchiette che passavano di lì e in F1 si vinceva e si crepava.
-
void
- (h)old
- Messaggi: 5661
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 17:11
- Contatta:
-
AndreHCI
- Messaggi: 2065
- Iscritto il: mercoledì 22 dicembre 2004, 18:54
- Località: Hai presente Garulagno?
- Contatta:
-
void
- (h)old
- Messaggi: 5661
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 17:11
- Contatta:
-
Mistostretto
- Messaggi: 3001
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 21:37
- Località: -------------------------------- 15674 River Forest Drive, Lake Oswego (Oregon) USA
- Contatta:
certo che c'e' gia stata.
l'87% dei serie3 bmw venduti in italia e' a nafta.
altre auto anche in altri segmenti non sono lontani da questa cifra, ormai anche a causa della mancanza di valide alternative a benzina.
Il fatto e' che sti disel stanno riempiendo davvero l'ambiente di polveri sottili, altro che la polvere d'amianto della TAV.
Questi ci stanno ammazzando, e i FAP gli faranno le seghe.
l'87% dei serie3 bmw venduti in italia e' a nafta.
altre auto anche in altri segmenti non sono lontani da questa cifra, ormai anche a causa della mancanza di valide alternative a benzina.
Il fatto e' che sti disel stanno riempiendo davvero l'ambiente di polveri sottili, altro che la polvere d'amianto della TAV.
Questi ci stanno ammazzando, e i FAP gli faranno le seghe.
-
kart1980
- Messaggi: 119
- Iscritto il: sabato 5 febbraio 2005, 23:53
- Località: Modena/Ancona
Filmato della presentazione.
Il rombo sembra quello di una corriera
http://www.gff-gmbh.net/projekte/kunden/audi/dsl.asx
Il rombo sembra quello di una corriera
http://www.gff-gmbh.net/projekte/kunden/audi/dsl.asx
-
void
- (h)old
- Messaggi: 5661
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 17:11
- Contatta:
-
stramazzone
- (h)old
- Messaggi: 4453
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 22:39
- Località: Grato Soul
Ma io in sto filmato non ho sentito il rombo...kart1980 ha scritto:Filmato della presentazione.
Il rombo sembra quello di una corriera
http://www.gff-gmbh.net/projekte/kunden/audi/dsl.asx
-
giovagt
- Messaggi: 1706
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 19:17
- Località: Rimini
- Contatta:
-
eTiLiKo
- (h)old
- Messaggi: 5156
- Iscritto il: martedì 28 dicembre 2004, 23:44
- Contatta:
Ora quell con la leon TDI si vanteranno un sacco,così ci sarà più gusto a staccargli gli specchietti.
--- www.autech.it ---
-
PizzaShow
- Messaggi: 240
- Iscritto il: giovedì 24 novembre 2005, 18:28
- Località: Togo Togo Togo
-
Mistostretto
- Messaggi: 3001
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 21:37
- Località: -------------------------------- 15674 River Forest Drive, Lake Oswego (Oregon) USA
- Contatta:
void, ah si, un 2000 benzina non ha senso contro un 2000 TD, almeno su un'auto NORMALE, e so che sai cosa intendo per NORMALE.
Ma siamo franchi: e' un vero peccato che chi ci governa adesso, prima, o poi, abbia mandato in vacca questo paese, riducendoci tutti dei barboni che corrono a comprare motori a nafta perche la benzina costa e i benzina bevono..
A me piacciono i motori a benzina, che hanno il sound giusto, non fanno nuvole di merda nera quando affondi il gas, quando li accendi a freddo non battono come un john deere, e soprattutto se aspirati, sono molto piu rotondi nel funzionamento delle loro controparti 'agricole'..
Un po e' per quello che sono rimasto colpito dai benzina honda: piccoli, ben fatti, bei materiali, non si scassano, bevono pochino e camminano tantino. Non ho mai guidato altri benzina aspirati cosi affidabile e performanti, ma i diesel in genere sono tristini e mi fanno cadere le palluccie...
Ma siamo franchi: e' un vero peccato che chi ci governa adesso, prima, o poi, abbia mandato in vacca questo paese, riducendoci tutti dei barboni che corrono a comprare motori a nafta perche la benzina costa e i benzina bevono..
A me piacciono i motori a benzina, che hanno il sound giusto, non fanno nuvole di merda nera quando affondi il gas, quando li accendi a freddo non battono come un john deere, e soprattutto se aspirati, sono molto piu rotondi nel funzionamento delle loro controparti 'agricole'..
Un po e' per quello che sono rimasto colpito dai benzina honda: piccoli, ben fatti, bei materiali, non si scassano, bevono pochino e camminano tantino. Non ho mai guidato altri benzina aspirati cosi affidabile e performanti, ma i diesel in genere sono tristini e mi fanno cadere le palluccie...
-
void
- (h)old
- Messaggi: 5661
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 17:11
- Contatta:
- AieieVTEC
- Messaggi: 2936
- Iscritto il: domenica 10 ottobre 2004, 20:09
- Località: Pazzolandia
- Contatta:
Io sono uno tra i primi che "per adesso" non comprerà un diesel però non dovete spargere così tanta merda su quei motori, se andate a vedere c'è più tecnologia nei diesel che nei benzina, sono stati fatti anche passi da gigante, non mettiamoci i paraocchi e non schifiamo tutto quello che non ci va....
E poi sinceramente a me dei PM10 FOTTE SEGA.....
E poi sinceramente a me dei PM10 FOTTE SEGA.....
-
eTiLiKo
- (h)old
- Messaggi: 5156
- Iscritto il: martedì 28 dicembre 2004, 23:44
- Contatta: